![]() ![]() In a contrast to some of my opinions regarding Super Smash Bros., I do not think that Game Freak and all those other companies reusing ideas for future Generations to fill up space is a bad thing. Now, before I continue, I would like to make something clear. Sometimes repeated content will even appear within the same game. ![]() In the Smash titles and other games, we see the same kind of treatment with some of the games' characters from one entry to another. See, the reason I'm making this thread is because I've wanted to try creating a list of all of the "original" Pokémon we've seen so far in the franchise- that is to say, Pokémon whose ideas, concepts, et cetera, aren't directly stolen from Pokémon similar to the so-called parent or parents. games, another favorite Nintendo franchise of mine, to explain some of the things I wanted to talk about. For all intents and purposes, I'll be referring to some of the terminology from the Super Smash Bros. Have you ever stopped to notice that some Pokémon are just a little bit too similar to other Pokémon? Dare I say, reused concepts levels of similar? In other game fandoms, we see words like "clones" and "copies" being tossed around a lot with this kind of thing. I've been thinking about something a lot lately when taking my everyday stroll through these threads. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |